Why are medical transcribers far better than Digital Transcribing software?

When it comes to transcribing audio files of doctors into text format, your medical practice can have a few options. You can choose digital transcribing software or hire medical transcribers who can do the work. However, whether you are interested in speedy transcription or accuracy, there are services best suited for your practice's needs.

The main difference between medical transcribers and digital transcribing software is mainly the mode of transcription. Digital transcribing software uses computer technology to convert audio into text format. It does not require any person to transcribe information. For this reason, many companies consider digital transcribing software to be an easiest and most cost-effective solution. However, some factors have proven this to be wrong. Digital transcribing software requires training for the dictator and the software to get started. Moreover, these can also suffer from gargled voice recordings or corrupted audio files.

Another disadvantage of using digital transcribing software is the lack of accuracy. The faults with these are that they suffer from a higher rate of spelling and grammar mistakes. This can be a disaster for many doctors or healthcare professionals in need of medical transcription services because they require data that are accurate and error-free. So when compared to digital transcribing software, medical transcribers are a better option.

Medical Transcription services involve medical transcribers who manually transcribe audio files of doctors to written format. Since there are persons who are involved in handling the data conversion, the amount of errors committed is far lesser than those of digital transcribing software. Moreover, medical transcribers are capable of doing corrections and add punctuations to the context. In a nutshell, the texts will be readily available without a need for any human review. Medical practitioners end up saving a lot of money and time by hiring medical transcribers, rather than using digital transcribing software for their work.

Hiring medical transcribers will seem to be a more expensive option at the initial stage; however, in context to the long-term, these are more cost-effective. There are fewer requirements for quality control, editing, and software issues. Moreover, you don't need to train medical transcribers because they will automatically be providing you with realistic transcription results.

Often we tend to ask, "Will medical transcribers take more time to transcribe information manually?"

In reality, the answer is no, because professional medical transcribers are adept to their jobs and they can readily transcribe, edit or review reports within a minimal time without the help of an extra person to check those reports for accuracy. So, in case you need to reduce the time it takes to transcribe, go for medical transcribers rather than taking the time consuming and costly digital transcribing software into consideration.

The use of digital transcribing software can often be the cause of quality control problems. These can lead to many problems in text files and can negatively impact in the following cases:

·     If a person is speaking too softly or loudly

·     If the speaker has an accent

·     If the speaker mumble

·     If the software picks up noises within the system or any background noises

All these can be misinterpreted by the digital transcribing software and disrupt the flow of information.

So if you are keen on saving money & time on medical transcription, your best option will be to go for professional medical transcribers rather than digital transcribing software. With medical transcribers, your medical practice will win with accurate transcription results in minimal time as compared to any software.

Hence we can conclude saying that even today medical transcribers are far better than digital transcribing software.